Assessing and Supporting Argumentation with Online Rubrics
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Analytic Frameworks for Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Learning Environments
Over the last decade, researchers have developed sophisticated online learning environments to support students engaging in argumentation. This review first considers the range of functionalities incorporated within these online environments. The review then presents five categories of analytic frameworks focusing on (1) formal argumentation structure, (2) normative quality, (3) nature and func...
متن کاملRubrics for designing and evaluating online asynchronous discussions
The purpose of the study reported on in this paper was to identify performance criteria and ratings in rubrics designed for the evaluation of learning in online asynchronous discussions (OADs) in post-secondary contexts. We analysed rubrics collected from Internet sources. Using purposive sampling, we reached saturation with the selection of 50 rubrics. Using keyword analysis and subsequent gro...
متن کاملCombining Textual Entailment and Argumentation Theory for Supporting Online Debates Interactions
Blogs and forums are widely adopted by online communities to debate about various issues. However, a user that wants to cut in on a debate may experience some difficulties in extracting the current accepted positions, and can be discouraged from interacting through these applications. In our paper, we combine textual entailment with argumentation theory to automatically extract the arguments fr...
متن کاملSupporting online learning with games
This paper presents a study on Web-based learning support systems that is enhanced with two major subsystems: a Webbased learning game and a learning-oriented Web search. The Internet and the Web may be considered as a first resource for students seeking for information and help. However, much of the information available online is not related to the course contents or is wrong in the worse cas...
متن کاملTowards assessing depth of argumentation
For analyzing argumentative text, we propose to study the ‘depth’ of argumentation as one important component, which we distinguish from argument quality. In a pilot study with German newspaper commentary texts, we asked students to rate the degree of argumentativeness, and then looked for correlations with features of the annotated argumentation structure and the rhetorical structure (in terms...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Education Studies
سال: 2013
ISSN: 1913-9039,1913-9020
DOI: 10.5539/ies.v6n7p66